[Disclaimer: This has been written on the 9th day of the author’s self-isolation due to persistent cough and sore throat, and amid recurring episodes of catatonia, mild hallucination, and hysterical cackling at the sight of TV news anchors and onions. Any disrespect shown or hurt caused to any lawyer, advocate, journalist, politician or any other person connected with or disconnected to the judiciary is entirely intentional.]
Despite the title, this isn’t about the ethics (assuming the existence of any) of ex-Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi accepting the NDA government’s offer of a Rajya Sabha seat. Nor is it about the ethics (assuming they have any) of these myriad lawyers, journalists, politicians and affiliated scoundrels who today are questioning Gogoi’s ethics, when just two years ago – on January 12, 2018 to be precise – the same bunch had extolled Gogoi as some kind of judicial hero for having been one of the four Supreme Court judges who held a press conference to publicly accuse then Chief Justice of India Deepak Mishra of improprieties.
Ethics in India is like the radioactive element Polonium-214: it has a rather short half-life.
This is about the 3.3 crore cases that are pending before courts in India.
Now, numbers numb the brain—especially, large numbers. We usually regard anything more than six as a blurry ‘many’. So, how in the name of Bakasura the Ravenous does one comprehend a number like 3.3 crores? How can we visualize it, get a feel of what it is?
It’s important that we can do this. Because India is all about very large numbers; especially in the synergistic realms of political swindling, business theft and general loot of the public exchequer by public and private individuals and institutions. For example, there’s Rana Kapoor, Founder of YES Bank, whose maxim seems to have been “Founders Keepers” as he scammed us of at least Rs 3000 crores (they’re still counting). Vijay Mallya, that ethylated and spirited Kingfisher entrepreneur, made off to Britain with Rs 9000 crores of public money kindly gifted to him by nine banks. Nirav Modi the Hira Chor (I just love the way our journalists call him ‘Diamantaire’ ) robbed Rs 28,000 crores from just one bank (Punjab National Bank).
And so, ignoring your howls of protest and with a murmured Guru Stotram to the great Isaac Asimov who had a way of making the most complex things simple to understand, we shall try and explain this number of pending court cases—3.3 crores— in a manner that even Rahul Gandhi might comprehend (if he concentrates really hard).
In sallying forth, we shall try our best to retain our footing on the treacherously narrow and slippery path that runs high above the dreadful chasm of Contempt of Court.
Any business involving Indian courts generates colossal quantities of paper – in the form of indemnities, oaths, bonds, undertakings, agreements, powers of attorney, declarations, affidavits, deeds, and a plethora of other documents. Each document is invariably photocopied in triplicate at the very least.
Why so many copies? No-one knows.
Maybe it’s prescribed in the Shastras and Puranas. Maybe it’s just that no one dares ask why.
I personally believe all the kabaadiwallahs, channawallahs, peanut vendors, et al. are running this multiple-photocopies system in cahoots with lawyers and advocates to ensure that they receive a vast, steady and sustainable supply of waste paper for packaging their wares—a fine example of the Sustainable Circular Economy.
Anyway: to return to the topic from which we were rudely distracted by ourselves…
Let’s assume, very conservatively, that each court case involves 2000 sheets of A-4 sized paper located in various files. Then, 3.3 crore court cases give us a total of 66 billion A4 sheets (that’s 66000000000). Since we know that an A4 sheet measures 21 cm × 29.7 cm, it’s easy to work out the total area that can be covered by the paper that makes up 3.3. crore case files:
Area of paper = [66000000000 × 21 × 29.7] square cm = 4116 square kilometres (km2).
To visualize this better: with the paper from our pending court cases, we could completely paper over India’s six largest metropolises—National Capital Territory of Delhi (1484 km2), Bengaluru (709 km2), Hyderabad (650 km2), Mumbai (623.7 km2), Chennai (426 km2) and Kolkata (205 km2)— and still have enough paper left over (i.e. 289 million A4 sheets, with a total area of 18 km2) to cover 2812 football fields.
Well…we could instead paste our 66 billion A4 sheets together, lengthwise, and make a paper bridge that’s 19.6 million kilometres long—enough to stretch to the Moon and back 20 times, still leaving us 4.2 million km of paper with which to wrap Earth around the Equator 105 times.
If that’s not inspiring enough:
A good working estimate is that one large tree has to be felled to make about 10,000 sheets of A4 paper. This means that our 66 billion pending court cases represent the long-neglected and cruelly fragmented remains of 6.6 million trees!
One wonders how many of these pending cases pertain to our ecology and environment? To tree felling?
Economic development view
There’s also a bright side to the issue: a silver lining in the judicial cloud. Consider the fact that these 3.3 crore pending cases have for decades provided livelihoods to lakhs of advocates, legal interns, office assistants, stamp vendors, typists, photocopiers, notaries public, stamp and seal makers, oath commissioners, and other hard-working men and women. By ensuring that these court cases have remained pending, these heroes and heroines of our judiciary have in fact contributed significantly to India’s GDP.
May they continue to do so!
The Indian judiciary is doing its best to reduce the number of pending cases. For instance, in 2016, the subordinate courts disposed of a whopping 1.9 crore cases…but the problem is, over 2 crore fresh cases were filed in subordinate courts during that year. [see here for details].
Clearly, like the Red Queen, our judiciary is sprinting to stay in the same place…and steadily falling back. The number of pending cases just grows and grows.
Little wonder that out of the 3.3 crore currently pending cases, 86 lakh cases have been pending for five years and more in subordinate courts and High Courts.
How we can reduce this colossal backlog?
A friend suggests that we periodically line up and shoot all advocates who ask for adjournments. An attractive idea: but we fear it might be a violation of their fundamental rights to procrastinate.
We must instead look for a Constitutional solution.
Let’s focus only on these 86 lakh (8600000) cases pending for five years and more. Let’s suppose the government and judiciary set up 100 brand-new super-efficient Special Courts exclusively to dispose of these 86 lakh old cases, with each Court working 10 hours daily for 300 days a year. Furthermore, let’s suppose each Special Court completes hearing and disposal of a case every hour (i.e. it finishes off 10 cases daily, or 3000 cases a year).
How long will it take for these Special Courts to get through all 86 lakh old cases?
It would take 8600000 ÷ 100 × 3000 = 28.66 years.
So, if we set up the 100 Special Courts today, they could get the job done by November 2048!
Of course, that’s provided the litigants and their lawyers don’t appeal to higher courts against the verdicts in the Special Courts…
2 thoughts on “Courting Contempt”
A hilarious article on s very serious issue.
May your self isolation continue and your keyboard produce many more such articles!
Thanks so much, will do my best :)!